← All research

2026 · Article · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Claims of sex-dependent effects in the behavioral and brain sciences are infrequently supported by valid statistical comparisons

Madeline T Olivier; Andrew W Brown; Simon Chung; Colby J Vorland; Donna L Maney

In a sample of 200 behavioral and brain science papers claiming sex-dependent effects, 24% supplied appropriate statistical evidence supporting the claim.

Open-science resources

Resource verification & source notes
  • Free full text (PMC): The complete article body was retrieved from the public NCBI PMC JATS endpoint. This confirms free access; reuse permissions depend on the individual article license.
  • Audit data: The published availability statement identifies two shared data files. The public repository has both spreadsheets and an HTML analysis supplement.
  • Supplementary dataset 1: The article identifies these spreadsheets as the data supporting its findings; the PMC HTML includes this exact download link. The article page and exact link were verified; automated binary retrieval returned a browser check, so the spreadsheet contents were not inspected here.
  • Supplementary dataset 2: The article identifies these spreadsheets as the data supporting its findings; the PMC HTML includes this exact download link. The article page and exact link were verified; automated binary retrieval returned a browser check, so the spreadsheet contents were not inspected here.
  • Supplementary analyses: Live public OSF file inventory contains: SupplementaryMaterial.html. Downloaded and inspected HTML: figures, tables S1-S13, and analysis descriptions; zero code elements and no source-code download found. Paper claims code sharing, but this file does not verify executable analysis code.
  • Preprint: Same five authors in same order; matching analysis of 200 brain/behavioral science articles and sex-dependent claims, reporting appropriate tests in 24%; changed title.
  • Earlier preprint: Same five authors in same order; matching analysis of 200 brain/behavioral science articles and sex-dependent claims, reporting appropriate tests in 24%; changed title.
  • Free full text (PMC): The complete article body was retrieved from the public NCBI PMC JATS endpoint. This confirms free access; reuse permissions depend on the individual article license.

Publication details

Research themes

Statistical rigorReporting transparency

neuroscience · sex-differences

Author affiliations & identifiers
  • Madeline T Olivier: Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.
  • Andrew W Brown: Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205.; Arkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, AR 72202. · ORCID 0000-0002-1758-8205
  • Simon Chung: Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205.; Arkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, AR 72202. · ORCID 0000-0003-2349-3779
  • Colby J Vorland: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47403. · ORCID 0000-0003-4225-372X
  • Donna L Maney: Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. · ORCID 0000-0002-1006-2358

Versions & associated materials

These items belong to this research work. Their individual titles, author lists, and source identifiers are preserved below.

Claims of sex-dependent effects in the behavioral and brain sciences are infrequently supported by valid statistical comparisons

Project · 2026 · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)

Donna L. Maney; Simon Chung; Madeline Olivier; Andrew W. Brown; Colby J. Vorland

Reporting and Misreporting of Sex-Specific Effects in Psychology and Neuroscience

Poster · 2025 · SCORE Workshop, Emory University

Madeline T. Olivier; Colby J. Vorland; Simon Chung; Andrew W. Brown; Donna L. Maney

Preprint & version links

Related materials

Metadata sources: PubMed, OpenAlex, Google Scholar, CV. Classification is an editorial interpretation of the title, abstract, and supplied CV.