Automated assessment of the trustworthiness of biomedical publications: a protocol for a scoping review
Sets out a scoping review of automated methods for assessing the trustworthiness of biomedical publications.
Work in progress · Shown as a ship beside its home island.
Preprint; this version has not been peer reviewed.
Open-science resources
Resource verification & source notes
- Preprint: Public preprint record in the saved source catalogue. No final journal article identified as of retrieval.
Publication details
Research themes
Research toolsResearch integrity
Author affiliations & identifiers
- Evan Guerra: · ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3275-8871
- Joe D Menke: · ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-7549
- César Bernabé: · ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1795-5930
- Xiangji Ying: · ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1713-3788
- Colby J. Vorland: · ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4225-372X
- Andrew William Brown: · ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1758-8205
- Riaz Qureshi: · ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6670-4874
- Evan Mayo-Wilson: · ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-2459
- Halil Kilicoglu: · ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3987-9393
Versions & associated materials
These items belong to this research work. Their individual titles, author lists, and source identifiers are preserved below.
AI-assisted Rigor Assessment in Published Biomedical Research: A Scoping Review of Variability in Definitions and Generalizability
Source notes
- Guerra and Menke both have asterisks on manuscript byline; do not assume meaning without explicit footnote.
- Scholar has duplicate records with differing author order for the same OSF yph8c resource. Canonical manuscript order above overrides the landing-page metadata order.